Fathers face a tyranny against them in family court since the court denies their unalienable rights – also known as fundamental, constitutional, and individual rights – which comprehend their fair to parent their children. This article contrasts this circumstance with the state’s divorce and domestic violence industry’s propaganda that covers up family court’s unconstitutional employ of its greater excellent excuses – safety of women’s abuse excuse and the best interest of the minor excuse.
1. Evidence of a tyranny against fathers:
Constitutional protections that the courts and their processes are obliged to follow for all citizens, as litigants and defendants, were place in place to aid secure those fundamental rights – the very cause for which the U.S. was formed. In circumstance, the lack of such constitutional protections in court is evidence that fundamental rights are being denied.
Our founding fathers expected terrible laws to occur occasionally. They instituted constitutional court action protections – including fully informed juries – which would aid stem the tyranny such laws would produce.
Included in terrible laws are the ‘greater excellent excuse’ laws that all tyrannies impose. I call them ‘greater excellent’ since their execution denies individual rights for some ‘professed’ greater excellent according to some ideology or temporary necessity. However, of direction, no greater excellent is supposed to exceed our individual rights in a autonomous of charge society – as the U.S. was formed to be. So these individual rights are not ever subject to ballot since they’re unalienable.
I’ve categorized two laws – safety of women’s ‘abuse code’ and the ‘best interest of the minor’ code as ‘greater excellent excuse’ laws. That’s since their operation in family court clearly negates and denies both the unalienable rights as well as the constitutional protections that each of us is entitled to. The detailed nature of how these greater excellent laws are carried outside in family court shows that they ignore every aspect of constitutional protections and the maxims of code that promote court fairness for litigants. Therefore these laws represent a tyranny by their nature.
However beyond that, these ‘greater excellent excuse’ laws and their court processes overwhelmingly deny the rights of fathers while benefitting mothers exceptionally in divorce or paternity actions. The loss of paternal rights that fit fathers routinely face in family court is unconstitutional and akin to state kidnapping of his children from him. Then, the state’s imposes heavy payments – euphemistically called minor support – on fathers that are maliciously enforced and extorted by simple imprisonment of fathers without the required constitutional due action.
Both the fresh ‘safety of women abuse code’ and the distortion of contemporary family court processes with its ‘best interest of the minor’ code over its original form have been pushed by feminists under women’s rights organizations and their administration affiliates. Not a shred of ‘equal rights’ for fathers to their children’s attention is considered or allowed by such feminists.
As a result of these unconstitutional laws and processes that deny fathers their rights, fathers, families and our freedom are being ruined. These laws and those human beings in the state’s divorce and domestic violence industry that support them and benefit from them together constitute a tyranny against fathers – or often called a ‘war on fatherhood’. Here’s what fathers face under this tyranny.
2. Slavery of a father at the whim of a mother – under the feminist jurisprudence of family courts:
At the mother’s whim, the fit father is civilly murdered or civilly raped of his rights, his protections and his children.
For not doing anything incorrect, his children are taken from his attention, and then he’s turned into virtually a slave of the state and the mother who extort from him horrendous and impoverishing weekly payments that euphemistically are called minor support for whatever the mother wants to spend them on. These payments go on until the minor reaches as ancient as 23 years. And if the father doesn’t pay it all he goes to jail, is denied his license to propel, his license to employment, and his passport.
The fit father also faces two badges of infamy against him without him doing anything incorrect based on denying him his rights and constitutional protections under the feminist ‘greater excellent’ laws. These infamous badges are ‘deadbeat dad’ and ‘abuser’.
If the father can’t pay everything he’s ordered to pay, he’s called a deadbeat. The courts can and will send him to jail without constitutional due action under illegal contempt processes to extort money from him – not unlike mafia thugs enforcing payments of protection from innocent shopkeepers.
Receiving a restraining order (RO) against him requires no provable wrongdoing by him. Only the subjective statement of ‘dread’ by a woman is required for the court to grant it. It’s less than a misdemeanour. However the restraining order paints him as an abusive male to friends, and associates as well as his own children. And, any innocent and harmless violation of the RO will constitute him a criminal.
3. The propaganda to cover-up the truth:
However you’ll not hear or glance at anything of this sort since we’re flooded with propaganda of the state’s divorce and domestic violence industry. This industry feeds off the above court-ordered denials of fit and excellent fathers’ unalienable rights. From them, you’ll hear: * Women demand easily obtained restraining orders to be made safe from intimate partners they affirm they dread
* Family court processes are necessary to determine what’s in best interest of the children; after all, it’s the children that are most vital
* Fathers must ‘do the fair body’ – pay all the minor support ordered by the family court
* Deadbeat dads must be punished for not supporting their children
* The laws dealing with abuse and safety of women are honest and due action is upheld.
These statements sound excellent however they cover up the tyranny they produce. Each one is, in circumstance, a lie.
You’ll, of direction, never hear my term of ‘greater excellent’ excuse laws. Such a designation would expose the circumstance that these laws deny fathers their unalienable rights our nation was formed to secure for them. That’s an inconvenient truth which the feminist-instigated divorce and domestic violence industry wants to hide from the public. Exposing it would interfere with the ability, money and agenda it produces for them.
Shane Flait gives you the capability you need to fight for your rights.
Get his FREE Downloads at http://www.FathersRightsLegalAid.com
Take his ecourse: How to Handle Your Family Court Case at http://www.fathersrightslegalaid.com/HowToHandlePromo.htm